Constantinescu, M., Vică, C., Uszkai, R. & Voinea, C. (2022). Blame it on the AI? On the moral responsibility of Artificial Moral Advisors. Philosophy & Technology, 35(2), 1-26.
Contribution: arguing that Artificial Moral Advisors (AMAs) cannot qualify as morally responsible agents based on their incapacity to meet a set of four conditions moral responsibility, previously developed by the PI in the virtue ethics traditions; arguing that AMAs could instead morally enhance users if they are interpreted as enablers for moral knowledge of the contextual variables surrounding human moral decision-making, with the unexpected implication that such a use might enlarge human moral responsibility.